First, what doesn't matter to me. The fact that he's wealthy or Mormon or not very warm and fuzzy doesn't matter to me at all. That he had his own version of Obamacare doesn't matter nor does his flip flopping on issues. All politicians, except tea party types, flip flop when it's expedient. He doesn't speak particularly well, but neither does Obama without his teleprompters. Doesn't matter.
What I do wonder is really pretty basic. It goes to his ability to lead. Does he have that skill or would he be just another leader who governs by sound bite?
He is reputed to have been a highly successful businessman. Perhaps his wealth is testimony to that but I don't see his success in business translating to success in politics.
He may have been able to create business plans to save troubled companies but he has yet to lay out a plan to save a troubled nation.
As is true with most politicians, he is loyal to those who have stuck with him through thick and thin. However, if those advisers he would have to choose as President are no more astute regarding what's going with the country then his current advisers are with his campaign I've no reason to have faith in his ability to choose top notch cabinet members.
The race is virtually a dead heat. He is correct about one thing, a recent revelation that has come about purely by accident - whether or not we want to be a nation driven by individual effort and the freedoms that allow it or a nation driven by government demanded distribution of that which the successful have earned to the less successful. On that matter, to me, there is no choice. And it scares me.
Elections these days are poll driven. Romney has his pollsters. Are they finding different results no one knows about? If not, why aren't the polls being paid attention to and adjustments made? Why are the same advisers kept on?
If Romney runs his campaign with a deaf ear will he not run the country the same way? If he makes gaffes week in and week out why would we expect them not to continue into his presidency? How bad does one need to be to cause similar unrest like we're experiencing at the moment?
He ran for the presidency four years ago and lost to a weak candidate. I'd like to have seen some evidence that he learned from what cost him the nomination then. I've seen no evidence that he has.
I'm really disappointed with the Republicans. I'm disappointed in the men who have led in other venues and could lead this country who chose not to run. I'm disappointed in the slate of candidates they put before us. I'm disappointed in the candidate that has been chosen.
I don't know if I have another four years, but Hub and I are already in our 'how are we going to make do' mode. It is not a comfortable place to be. There are innumerable reasons I want to see a Republican victory and yes, it has to do with ideology. I just don't see the current crop of candidates, be it House, Senate or the presidency being able to carry it off.
How I wish there was a 'none of the above' to vote for by default.