Some times you need to have a say...
Monday, January 12, 2015
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Have We Ever Looked Worse?
This man is the President of the United States of America. The leader of the free world. Until he abdicated that position in the wake of the blood bath which occurred in Paris a few days ago.
I am ashamed for my country.
World leaders gathered with French President Hollande in a show of solidarity against Islamic terrorism. One was missing. Obama.
Why?
Consider those who put aside differences to attend the massive rally in Paris. Israel's Netanyahu. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Two who have little love for one another. Ukrainian President Poroshenko and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov. David Cameron was there. So was Angela Merkel. The King and Queen of Jordan. More than 40 in all. Except the United States. No President. No Vice President. No Secretary of State.
I wonder if France will stand with us the next time we need a coalition as they have in the past. Or any of the others for that matter. Well, it's not a problem concerning this continent you might say. Except for Canada just a few short weeks ago. Oh, yes, the Oklahoma beheading was in there too recently. And going back a ways to the "work place violence" at Fort Hood.
Yes. It is a problem on this continent and in this country with it's porous borders and political correctness run so amok authorities cannot monitor what goes on in Mosques.
When 9/11 happened the world let it be known they were all American. Why aren't we saying today we are all Charlie? We are, you know, and ignoring it doesn't make it any less true.
Why wasn't our President there? Is it because it wasn't at all about him? Leader of the free world? Not today.
I am ashamed for my country.
World leaders gathered with French President Hollande in a show of solidarity against Islamic terrorism. One was missing. Obama.
Why?
Consider those who put aside differences to attend the massive rally in Paris. Israel's Netanyahu. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Two who have little love for one another. Ukrainian President Poroshenko and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov. David Cameron was there. So was Angela Merkel. The King and Queen of Jordan. More than 40 in all. Except the United States. No President. No Vice President. No Secretary of State.
I wonder if France will stand with us the next time we need a coalition as they have in the past. Or any of the others for that matter. Well, it's not a problem concerning this continent you might say. Except for Canada just a few short weeks ago. Oh, yes, the Oklahoma beheading was in there too recently. And going back a ways to the "work place violence" at Fort Hood.
Yes. It is a problem on this continent and in this country with it's porous borders and political correctness run so amok authorities cannot monitor what goes on in Mosques.
When 9/11 happened the world let it be known they were all American. Why aren't we saying today we are all Charlie? We are, you know, and ignoring it doesn't make it any less true.
Why wasn't our President there? Is it because it wasn't at all about him? Leader of the free world? Not today.
Wednesday, January 07, 2015
The 21st Century Way
Without intending to Hillary Clinton has proven herself unworthy of the presidency. Why is that? Remember not too long ago when during a speech she talked of how we must understand our enemies and even empathize with them?
Wrong-o, Hillary. Today five terrorists stormed the offices of a satirical magazine in Paris and killed 12 people for daring to publish satirical cartoons about the terrorist's precious Mohammad. What a guy. Such marvelous actions he inspires.
We need neither understand nor empathize with these barbaric miscreants. We need to eliminate them from the top down. Or the bottom up. What ever works. Anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a fool's paradise. Do you really think they care if we understand them? No. Besides, what's to understand? They hate us, they want to annihilate us and take over the world according to their own accords. What? Do we want them to spell it out in English so we can understand it?
The more we placate them the worse they get. We're just giving them more time to work toward their ends. Just like the negotiations with Iran over the nuclear program they insist they don't have. Right.
When will moderate Muslims band together and condemn these people? When will the west get more aggressive in fighting them? When will this administration get real with the world?
It won't. The President will continue following his own drummer no matter the consequences. It has become apparent he has no interest in jobs nor economic reform nor anything else except what he deems in his own little netherworld to be desirable.
The worry is today it's Paris. It's getting closer. Where next? Coming across the pond isn't all that difficult these days. The last thing we need looking forward is another president who agrees with this one. That is if we're still here to look forward!
Wrong-o, Hillary. Today five terrorists stormed the offices of a satirical magazine in Paris and killed 12 people for daring to publish satirical cartoons about the terrorist's precious Mohammad. What a guy. Such marvelous actions he inspires.
We need neither understand nor empathize with these barbaric miscreants. We need to eliminate them from the top down. Or the bottom up. What ever works. Anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a fool's paradise. Do you really think they care if we understand them? No. Besides, what's to understand? They hate us, they want to annihilate us and take over the world according to their own accords. What? Do we want them to spell it out in English so we can understand it?
The more we placate them the worse they get. We're just giving them more time to work toward their ends. Just like the negotiations with Iran over the nuclear program they insist they don't have. Right.
When will moderate Muslims band together and condemn these people? When will the west get more aggressive in fighting them? When will this administration get real with the world?
It won't. The President will continue following his own drummer no matter the consequences. It has become apparent he has no interest in jobs nor economic reform nor anything else except what he deems in his own little netherworld to be desirable.
The worry is today it's Paris. It's getting closer. Where next? Coming across the pond isn't all that difficult these days. The last thing we need looking forward is another president who agrees with this one. That is if we're still here to look forward!
Tuesday, January 06, 2015
Is Bipartisanship Already Over?
Let's see, it's January 6, 2015. It looks like it's going to be a long year.
The President has finally made clear what he has been hinting at for years. He will veto the Keystone Pipeline. He will veto the medical device tax. He will veto a return to the 40 hour work week. And so forth and so on.
I've never seen anyone like this President in all my 70+ years. I cannot begin to understand his thought process. All I know is he keeps telling us his way is the 21st century way. I guess he thinks he can single handedly bring the rest of the world up to his standard no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
The question now is will the Congress revert to maybe the 20th century way when both sides of the aisle would work together to come up with viable compromise. Where both sides of the aisle would work together to over turn a veto when they knew in their heart of hearts the veto was wrong.
We have a lot of new blood in this Congress. I'm wondering what type it may be. Hopefully there is plenty of type A. A for America. The country, it seems, no longer has much tolerance for O.
The President has finally made clear what he has been hinting at for years. He will veto the Keystone Pipeline. He will veto the medical device tax. He will veto a return to the 40 hour work week. And so forth and so on.
I've never seen anyone like this President in all my 70+ years. I cannot begin to understand his thought process. All I know is he keeps telling us his way is the 21st century way. I guess he thinks he can single handedly bring the rest of the world up to his standard no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
The question now is will the Congress revert to maybe the 20th century way when both sides of the aisle would work together to come up with viable compromise. Where both sides of the aisle would work together to over turn a veto when they knew in their heart of hearts the veto was wrong.
We have a lot of new blood in this Congress. I'm wondering what type it may be. Hopefully there is plenty of type A. A for America. The country, it seems, no longer has much tolerance for O.
Monday, January 05, 2015
Why Can't Cops Protest?
Am I in the minority? I do not think the police turning their backs on Mayor DeBlasio was in poor taste nor was it an insult to their fallen comrades. If nothing more it was a show of support for the two officers who died because vehemence toward police had gotten out of hand. How else were they going to let it be known they aren't happy with their treatment.
If the Sharpton/DeBlasio race baiters have the right to protest then I think the police should too. Actually I think they've done it with class considering what they could do. After all, they are the ones armed to the hilt.
All they did, however, was turn their backs on the person they have a grievance with in the only venue where they could be sure he got the message. Or at least couldn't deny getting it. They didn't turn over and burn cars, they didn't break windows, beat civilians nor rob businesses. They didn't rain debris on unsuspecting pedestrians. They merely turned their backs. On the one person with whom they had a grievance.
Is our discomfort because of the brotherhood they share? They have each others backs in a way no other profession other than active duty combat soldiers do. Daily they face the worst of us more than the best. Sure, not all of them are good guys and sometimes we lose patience because it takes so long to weed out the bad ones. We don't like their 'attitude'. But what would we do without them?
We want their respect. Is it too much for them to ask the same from not only those they protect but from those to whom they must answer? I think not.
I'm willing to wager if we should ever have another, God forbid, incident like 9/11 who do you think would be leading the first responders? I think I can safely say it wouldn't be the likes of Bill DeBlasio. Most likely it would be a cop. We need to remember that.
If the Sharpton/DeBlasio race baiters have the right to protest then I think the police should too. Actually I think they've done it with class considering what they could do. After all, they are the ones armed to the hilt.
All they did, however, was turn their backs on the person they have a grievance with in the only venue where they could be sure he got the message. Or at least couldn't deny getting it. They didn't turn over and burn cars, they didn't break windows, beat civilians nor rob businesses. They didn't rain debris on unsuspecting pedestrians. They merely turned their backs. On the one person with whom they had a grievance.
Is our discomfort because of the brotherhood they share? They have each others backs in a way no other profession other than active duty combat soldiers do. Daily they face the worst of us more than the best. Sure, not all of them are good guys and sometimes we lose patience because it takes so long to weed out the bad ones. We don't like their 'attitude'. But what would we do without them?
We want their respect. Is it too much for them to ask the same from not only those they protect but from those to whom they must answer? I think not.
I'm willing to wager if we should ever have another, God forbid, incident like 9/11 who do you think would be leading the first responders? I think I can safely say it wouldn't be the likes of Bill DeBlasio. Most likely it would be a cop. We need to remember that.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



