Palin's Fadin' While Bachmann's Rockin'

The Iowa Straw Poll 2011 is history.  I find it amusing and annoying at the same time.  Amusing that the media pays so much attention to what is fund raiser for the Iowa Republican Party and annoying they put so much truck into a circus that has Bachmann the winner by 200 +/- votes over Ron Paul who I feel has no chance to win the nomination.  What is, however, is what is.

I will admit that I have to go to Bachmann's web site to see if she has begun articulating how she is going to achieve all of about which she rants.  Especially if the House and Senate go Democratic or at least the balance goes against her.  That seems to be the question always left out.  How?  And too, she isn't alone.  No one is asked and no one volunteers.  Except Herman Cain, but this isn't about him.

That aside, Sarah Palin is still skulking around the sidelines seeking attention.  It is neither the time nor the place for a tease, but then that's Palin.  I thought it time to compare these two women just in case of a worst case scenario!

I watched Bachmann with Chris Wallace this morning and saw an attractive, articulate candidate, one who dresses and conducts herself  in a professional manner.  No cutesy poo expressions, no wink wink.

I haven't seen much substance from either.  As I said, I need to do my homework on Bachmann.  Palin has hijacked the limelight since McCain lost in 2008 and I've seen no growth in substance other than being able to ad lib from pre-received talking points when swapping intellectualisms with Sean Hannity.

Bachmann is out there on the front lines.  Fielding the jabs, espousing her stands and doing rather well at it.  Palin?  She seems to drop in like an uninvited guest.  If she enters the race I do believe she'll do it to deny Bachmann, but if so she may have underestimated how tired people have become of her.  She's been replaced by a Congresswoman who actually has a record even if not sterling and a real Governor, Rick Perry, who would, I expect, make mince meat of her in a debate.

Whether or not I change my opinion of Michele Bachmann remains to be seen.  However, if I had to choose between these two women there is no contest.  Bachmann seems to genuinely care about the country.  Palin seems to genuinely care about herself. Rock on Michele!

Good Bye Old Friend

No, not Bacchus.  He left us two years ago this month.  It seems like yesterday and we still miss him terribly.  It's the couch.  His couch, really. He played on it, ate on it, we snuggled on it but mostly he slept on it.

We've had it for better than 20 years.  It was a purchase we made from the model house we bought in Simi Valley.  That was back in the eighties!  It has been recovered only once - when it moved from living room into family room.  Then we let our guard down and allowed the dogs on it.  Most came only when invited.  Bacchus owned it.

Recently I've had two good friends lose their dogs.  One unabashedly declared not only did he love his dog, but he was in love with his dog. Then wondered if we understood the depth of his feeling.  Of course we did.

The other, being a Buddist, is hoping her dog will return to her via reincarnation. Not being Buddist, I'm not sure how that works, but again, the depth of feeling.  Being widowed and totally alone she feels lost without him.  I worry about a degree of obsession with her but I understand the grief.

In time I hope the zest for life without their beloved pets returns.  Ours has though it has been  a slow process.  Mainly I think because we haven't and don't plan to get another dog.  There are a slew of reasons.

Reminders remain around the house though.  There are still some cans of food in the laundry room pantry.  His Mutt Lucks and grooming tools.  A couple of water dishes.  I still find tufts of fur stuck under a piece of furniture seldom moved.  And the couch.

We decided when he first got sick, when we knew the couch was due for replacement, that we wouldn't get rid of it as long as we had him.  And so we kept it, and kept it and kept it.  It was comfortable, well broken in and pretty thread bare.  Yet we were reluctant to make that move.

But it's time now.  New recliners suitable for old couch potatoes have taken it's place.  I'm happy with them for they too are comfortable.  I'll miss that old couch though.  It was a part of what made the house our home.  I miss the old dog too, who was even more so.

Red State Blue State

My entire focus on red and blue states recently have been my garden.

Everything political is in limbo until situations shake out.  I can only write about my disgust and disappointment and frustration so many times.

Last night, however, I indulged myself in the FOX Republican debate. Not much else was on.  Hub wasn't interested so he cleaned up his office while I had complete control of the remote and was able to watch the entire debate uninterrupted.  That in of itself was a rare pleasure!

Anyway, to parallel my gardening efforts, you can see Red is ripe for the picking and Blue, well they've proved themselves not yet ready for prime time.  Nice fruit though, don't you think?

I have some strong feelings about who I would not support yet none on who I might.  Just for the record and future reference, this is how last night struck me.

Bachmann - she said nothing of substance other than she is a fighter for her principles.  I had to agree with Santorum when he said fighting for a stance and losing time after time does not show leadership.  She's a featherweight at best though I know people love her.  I don't.

Pawlenty - lacks anything approaching charisma.  I don't think the exchanges between he and Bachmann stood him in good stead.  He just doesn't light my fire.

Romney - is Romney.  He does have business credentials and government credentials and has potential.  He certainly wants it bad enough.  But again, he doesn't get my juices flowing.

Huntsman  - interesting background.  I think he'd be more solid on foreign policy than any of the others.  And again, a good business and governmental background.

Paul - a very angry and frustrated man.  I agree with him on some of his stances, others I consider undoable because of being more extreme than voters will accept.  I'm not quite a Libertarian I guess.

Santorum - he wants it but I'm not sure what he stands for.  Another one who just doesn't touch me.  A bit too socially conservative for me also.

Newt - wow!  He did well.  He is a very bright man and certainly had the back story on everything he espoused.  I agree with him on the issues discussed but wonder if his baggage will be the deciding factor.  He certainly doesn't take any guff from the press.  His wife may be problematic too.

Cain -  I like him though I don't think he has a chance.  My guess is we'll be back to bland white men for awhile.  He should at least get a high profile cabinet post should the Republicans win.  He's smart and precise and has a great sense of humor.  He's the most refreshing candidate out there. I think, though, his lack of government involvement may hurt.  I'd like to think I'm wrong.

So that's it.  I've got to go pick those raspberries now.  I do know what to expect from them!

The Downgrade SHOULD Be A Wake Up Call

The possibility of a down grade in the U.S. credit rating has been like a ticking bomb for months.  It has been downgraded long before now by others than S&P but no one paid much attention to it.  At least it wasn't widely reported in the press.

Now all of a sudden the reality has hit and what do we do?  We look for someone to blame.  It's the Tea Party's fault.  It's the Democrats, the Republicans, Obama's  and of course George Bush.  Pick one.  How about all of the above!

So what do we do.  We attack Standard and Poor.  They are immature and foolish.  Their numbers are wrong.  Of course they've never been wrong before as long as they gave us the AAA rating. And they warned us. As have the others.  Moody's and Fitch. The market answered by taking a nose dive even though it was only one of three rating agencies.  But as I pointed out the other two haven't given us a pass.

So what's it all about?  We spend more than we take in and we've passed our limit.  We've borrowed so much that default looms unless we borrow even more and the lenders are saying, "Awww, I don't know how they're ever going to get ahead enough to repay us.  So we'll charge them higher interest to protect ourselves."  Of course that's a double edged sword and if we did default, they'd be out.  Debt forgiveness?  I wouldn't hold my breath.

When you boil down all the rhetoric, what we're being told is the rating agencies see no sign that we're able to get beyond our partisan bickering to put forth a budget that shows a plan for the way back.  Heck, the Democrats haven't put out a budget for two years. There is a law against that.  So what?

The President rejects everything that's been put forward whether it was good or bad plus offering no guidance on how he sees a fix.  The rest of the world is  now wondering where it can go for a stable currency.  Switzerland comes to mind.

So the President is going to move on to jobs.  I've got a clue for him.  With the economy in the tank there will be no jobs.  Tea Party take note.  You took us to the brink, making us look like fools and got nothing for it.  Democrats take note.  Put out a budget.  Republicans take note. Work with the Democrats ~ and vice versa including the Tea Party.  Of course being on vacation for the month we've heard little from you.

We've not heard much from the candidates either.  But Standard and Poor is hearing something loud and clear.  We've no act to get together.  I hate to say we deserve what's happening, but we're the ones who put the people in office.  Strange, isn't it, that we elected an administration and Congress who are deaf, dumb and blind.

A wake up call is only helpful if it's heard, the issue talked about as a national problem rather than a partisan pain in the neck and seen in the first place.  I fear that alarm may be a silent one.   The gang of twelve yet to be appointed will probably have a great deal to do with what Moody's and Fitch decide in the not too distant future.  I've heard little optimism from financial experts.  What an endorsement of our government!

What happens if they fail?  I fear Nancy Pelosi's dramatic statement about saving life on the planet as we know it may become a very haunting refrain.

Taiwan ~ Between A Rock And A Hard Place

It has been said that California is too big to govern.  I sometimes wonder if the same isn't true of this country.  As we look back on the theater that had been going on in Congress that has netted us nothing positive, we sigh with relief that at least it has been put to rest for awhile.  I expect nothing positive to come out of the committee of twelve that will be assigned to find budget cuts.  It's rather hard to do with no budget.

Another distraction has been the hype beginning to form around the upcoming Iowa straw poll.  I watch the ground swell around Michele Bachmann and wonder if we will ever learn that personality alone does not equate presidential material.

Meanwhile, back in the rest of the world, countries are struggling with their own financial problems - and wars.  I wonder if the people of Syria are wondering where the United States is.  Doing what we seem to do best.  Posturing.

Then there is China and it's ongoing ambition to crush the independence out of Taiwan.  We have an agreement with Taiwan, the Taiwan Relations Act, to supply them with the weapons needed to defend themselves against China's aggression. They need F-16s, badly.  They have old ones, but they are no longer adequate to do the job.  We have been asked to commence the sale, but so far, as seems to be a habit with this administration, have turned a deaf ear on the request.

Admittedly, we do have a problem.  China does not want us to sell Taiwan the F-16s.  So what to do?  Risk war with China in defense of Taiwan or leave Taiwan as a sitting duck with inadequate air power?

According to The Wall Street Journal , Mr. Obama is leaning against the sale.    He doesn't want to risk irritating China.  We all understand why.  As he cuts our defense budget, the Chinese have grown theirs some 70% over the last five years!  Ouch!

The order would also provide American jobs to produce the plane, perhaps even saving the production line that's due to close down in 2013.  So what to do?  A word bandied about quite a bit that has often been empty.  Compromise?  Refurbish the old planes but don't sell any new ones.  Why do I doubt that would bring the aircraft to speed?

What does it tell the rest of the world?  That the U.S. won't stand up to a bully no matter how important it is to a friend?  Bullies.  Let me see.  Russia.  China.  The Saudis. Iran. Syria. Libya. Maybe that's the idea.  How many more need be added to the list before we won't have any friends left for which to stand?